BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Wu Y, Xu MM, Wang GL, Du WD, Su XH. Peripheral blood marker changes predict response and prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer with neoadjuvant sintilimab plus XELOX. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(10): 122796 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.122796]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We are highly satisfied with the complete publication workflow of our manuscript. Throughout the entire process from initial submission to final online publication, the editorial team has sustained seamless, constructive communication and delivered timely, precise responses, with transparent and standardized guidelines provided at every procedural stage. The professional and rigorous language polishing and typesetting services have guaranteed the high-quality presentation of the final published article. We wish to extend our sincere gratitude to all the involved personnel for their dedicated efforts, including the assistant editors, editorial board members, peer reviewers, language editors, and production team. We also propose that the journal further expand its academic promotion channels in future operations, to strengthen the dissemination capacity and global academic visibility of high-quality original works within the gastrointestinal oncology community. We look forward to the sustained and robust development of the journal, and anticipate its continuous growth into a more authoritative and influential academic platform in the field of gastrointestinal oncology.